zlacker

[return to "Outlook now ignores Windows' Default Browser and opens links in Edge by default"]
1. acomje+Gf[view] [source] 2023-06-27 14:26:31
>>mfwit+(OP)
Its getting worse everywhere:

some things I've noticed: Mobil Safari seems to be using the search bar to hijack my google search (Particularly for locations which open in apple maps)

Although I'm mostly linux these days I went to install an alternative browser on a windows machine (using edge to download). I mentioned this in another post, but edge seems to watch for "chrome" or "firefox" downloads and politely reminds you that 'Edge is a great browser with added "trust of microsoft"' (A company who happen to be watching when you download a web browser).

https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/2/22813733/microsoft-window...

Linux seems like an OS that is way more respectful.

◧◩
2. buro9+7G[view] [source] 2023-06-27 16:17:57
>>acomje+Gf
WSL2 in Windows means you can just run a Debian underneath and launch a non-snap Firefox from there and have it appears in Windows.

Now you get the benefit of Windows power management (and that beautiful laptop battery life) but a web browser Microsoft isn't going to mess with.

This sounds hilarious were it not the way I actually work.

PS: I'll also mention that VSCode from Windows to WSL2 + Debian is a mind-blowingly wonderful thing, I don't know how it works but it's near magical as a dev environment when you need a full Linux but like having battery life.

◧◩◪
3. trelan+SZ[view] [source] 2023-06-27 17:36:53
>>buro9+7G
Or you could run Linux on Linux hardware and get the full hardware support and sweet battery life without the Microsoft spyware.
◧◩◪◨
4. dmitry+Q21[view] [source] 2023-06-27 17:53:11
>>trelan+SZ
> sweet battery life

Linux has never been this, and likely never will be. On any hardware supported fully by both, Windows will always have better battery life. Back when I was a thinkpad user, i'd literally live in a vmware workstation linux VM on windows, and THIS had better battery life than linux natively on the same thinkpad.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. bombel+o91[view] [source] 2023-06-27 18:24:16
>>dmitry+Q21
I came to assume the battery only exists to act as an uninterruptible power supply as I travel to the next power outlet ;)

It feels like over the past 10y Linux only went from 2h to 3h of battery life. While MacBook went from 3h to 13h.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. diffeo+qk3[view] [source] 2023-06-28 11:53:56
>>bombel+o91
Battery life of hackintoshes never was that impressive or was it? But if you want apples to oranges instead, then even in its very basic, hacky state linux on that macbook gets 8-10 hours:

https://twitter.com/AsahiLinux/status/1500039345142923269?la...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. bombel+8c4[view] [source] 2023-06-28 16:03:35
>>diffeo+qk3
That's pretty good indeed! I don't like the keyboard layout (I want my delete key!). But that's a minor inconvenience compared to how good the machine appears to run Linux.
[go to top]