I don't understand how these two sentences are related and the article doesn't explain it as far as I can tell. They seem to be vaguely insinuating that video games appropriating the red cross logo have caused these deaths, which is surely an absurd claim but I can't figure out what else they might mean.
EDIT: A lot of defensive responses. To be clear, no one is impugning the Red Cross or disrespecting the work they're doing. I merely don't understand the reasoning in TFA.
This saves lives, and protects those who run into danger zones to save people.
If we slap red cross symbols on people with medical equipment that you see in video games, it'll just dilute the meaning and maybe next time someone sees a vehicle with the red cross symbol they'll think "oh, that's just the enemy's medics" and throw a grenade that way.
If I understand correctly the red cross will treat anyone regardless of the side they came in with.
The red cross is used by the enemies medics. It's one of main allowed uses.
The issue comes with a distinction not commonly used in video games, true medics using the red cross as a logo are designated non-combatants, while they are armed they are only to use their weapons in protection of themselves or their patients and under no circumstances are they to directly engage in offensive military operations.
It's also part of the reason why combat medics in the US no longer use the symbol, without it they can act offensively
Also the Taliban have no qualms about destroying an ambulance or shooting a medic.