zlacker

[return to "CNN reporter arrested live on air while covering Minneapolis protests [video]"]
1. JSavag+0l[view] [source] 2020-05-29 14:53:12
>>void_n+(OP)
How is it legal for a police offer to arrest someone without any warning, without even telling them why they're being arrested, and without probable cause? What are the repercussions for these officers for falsely arresting people? Do they suffer any consequences, or do they suffer no punishment for this injustice?

This is extremely disturbing, and further evidence that the U.S. is a police state. I've never felt more ashamed of my country.

◧◩
2. monoca+zl[view] [source] 2020-05-29 14:55:43
>>JSavag+0l
> How is it legal for a police offer to arrest someone without any warning, without even telling them why they're being arrested, and without probable cause?

Cops can hold you for some amount of time, generally around 24 hours without cause.

> What are the repercussions for these officers for falsely arresting people?

None

> Do they suffer any consequences, or do they suffer no punishment for this injustice?

No punishment.

◧◩◪
3. JSavag+5m[view] [source] 2020-05-29 14:58:01
>>monoca+zl
That's horrifying. Why don't we change the law?
◧◩◪◨
4. camgun+Hm[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:00:49
>>JSavag+5m
Courts are normally extremely deferential to law enforcement. Coupled with the fact that increasing oversight or increasing restrictions on law enforcement leads to a barrage of "soft on crime" political attack ads, and you get what we have today.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Anthon+OW[view] [source] 2020-05-29 17:34:02
>>camgun+Hm
The "soft on crime thing" was a lot more effective in the 90s when there was a lot more actual crime and so people were more afraid of it.

At this point I'm basically waiting for a politician to adopt "soft on crime" as a campaign slogan and rebrand it as a rehabilitation program where you turn drug dealers into docile flower shop owners as opposed to opponents who "make crime tough" by sending people to "crime school" prisons and turning them into hardened career criminals with switchblades and facial tattoos.

The real problem is the same as it is in general -- special interest groups (in this case police and prison guard unions and private prison companies) are the ones who spend the most effort lobbying on the issue. It also doesn't help at all when we disenfranchise "convicts" because we're then disenfranchising the victims of the system whenever it makes a mistake (which is often).

[go to top]