zlacker

[return to "Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang"]
1. murbar+04[view] [source] 2019-07-02 15:29:33
>>el_dud+(OP)
The US is forcing its tourists to give away a list of all their social media accounts and all their email accounts. If you're a foreign journalist writing pseudonymously for your safety, you must now share that information with the US government to enter the country. This isn't quite on the level of forcing people to install malware on their phone yet, but give it a couple years.
◧◩
2. lixtra+G6[view] [source] 2019-07-02 15:47:54
>>murbar+04
On the last ESTA form I saw, they were asking not for all, but specific accounts. Apart from fb and Twitter there was also github, but I don’t remember seeing mastedon for example. Did I miss something?
◧◩◪
3. rwmj+d7[view] [source] 2019-07-02 15:51:04
>>lixtra+G6
The ESTA will be a bit different, but the exact question from the US visa application is:

7. Public-facing social media platforms and identifiers/handles used during the last five years. This includes any websites or applications the applicant has used to create or share content (photos, videos, status updates, etc.) as part of a public profile.

I was advised by my lawyer that this covers Reddit and HN, and Facebook/Instagram (if I had any of those which I don't any more).

The lawyer didn't mention github however, but someone can search my name and find that in 1 click anyway, that's hardly private information.

◧◩◪◨
4. mc32+za[view] [source] 2019-07-02 16:08:14
>>rwmj+d7
Haven’t read up on this, but looks like if they’re looking for graphs they would include linked in profiles too...
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. pmille+Bb[view] [source] 2019-07-02 16:14:06
>>mc32+za
Even if you don’t post anything on LinkedIn besides your work experience, arguably, that would count as “status updates.” This would seem to include any number of dating sites and other things people don’t typically think of as “social media,” as well.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. rwmj+Ub[view] [source] 2019-07-02 16:16:07
>>pmille+Bb
Yes, the lawyer mentioned LinkedIn as one. She didn't mention dating websites specifically that I recall, but I agree with you it sounds like they would be covered from the definition.
[go to top]