zlacker

[return to "Sex and STEM: Stubborn Facts and Stubborn Ideologies"]
1. natch+x3[view] [source] 2018-02-15 09:35:41
>>andren+(OP)
it’s fine and valid to research whether people encounter improper bias in their careers, which is clearly often the case. But their discussion is incomplete without at least recognition of another possible partial cause of gender disparity in tech, the fact that many sexist anti-STEM cues are given to children at a much earlier stage, way before careers are even on the horizon. These cues are delivered by parents, teachers, parents of friends, other adults, and other children. Cues can be as subtle as a wide-eyed look while reacting to the news that Sally wants to be a programmer, where Joey gets no such wide eyes for the same news. Any study that overlooks that cause, in order to focus only on the causes highlighted in recent dramatic episodes, is an example of the phenomenon mentioned in the title of the book their chapter appears in: Groupthink.
◧◩
2. shard9+b5[view] [source] 2018-02-15 10:06:48
>>natch+x3
> the fact that many sexist anti-STEM cues are given to children at a much earlier stage, way before careers are even on the horizon.

Would you say that is a problem that can or should be fixed after the fact? For instance, if we assume that we know the major cause to be social conditioning at young ages should we then try to correct that after they leave education?

[go to top]