zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. transf+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-03-25 22:40:47
I have to agree about the generics, and agree a bit about error handling too.

Also, I wasn't impressed by the speed. I wrote a program in Ruby, Go and Elixir and expected Go to win, but is was 1x, 5x, 20x respectively, and I could never figure out why there was such a discrepancy.

Even so, if they added generics and improved performance, I would be very inclined to use it. It is surprisingly comfortable to code in.

replies(2): >>isaiah+d4 >>Eugene+Xq
2. isaiah+d4[view] [source] 2015-03-25 23:25:05
>>transf+(OP)
I would wager it was human error.
3. Eugene+Xq[view] [source] 2015-03-26 07:10:21
>>transf+(OP)
1 program in Ruby to measure the speed of whole language is not enough. https://xkcd.com/605/
[go to top]