zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. peterj+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-02-17 10:45:22
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you supposed to evaluate stacked exponents from the top down? That is, 9^(9^9) instead of (9^9)^9. If that's the case, 9^(9^9) is much larger than 9!!. Though I'm not sure how much larger, since I couldn't find any big integer calculators online that would give me an actual result for 9^(9^9).
replies(2): >>cradle+61 >>vacri+Sl1
2. cradle+61[view] [source] 2015-02-17 11:12:09
>>peterj+(OP)
9^(9^9) is ... wait for it... 4e369693099 bigger than 9!!

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=9%5E9%5E9+-+9%21%21

replies(2): >>peterj+G1 >>Bhavde+wI
◧◩
3. peterj+G1[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-02-17 11:30:42
>>cradle+61
Ah thanks! How could I forget Wolfram Alpha? =)
◧◩
4. Bhavde+wI[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-02-17 19:09:13
>>cradle+61
Shouldn't it be (9!)!? http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=9%5E9%5E9+-+%289%21%29%...
5. vacri+Sl1[view] [source] 2015-02-18 02:51:02
>>peterj+(OP)
It seems you're correct - I was just pounding the values in sequence into a calculator, much like a determined monkey would.
[go to top]