zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. fishto+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:36:56
True, but if you were Gigantic Auto Manufacturer, would you build these patents into a billion-dollar factory without a stronger guarantee that Tesla won't about-face in 5-10 years? I wouldn't risk it.
replies(3): >>angers+M >>jusben+u1 >>justin+N1
2. angers+M[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:43:06
>>fishto+(OP)
It's an interesting move...you help produce (potentially) lots of little companies to attack the market share of the entrenched players, but those same players cannot/will not be able to use the same advantages. Good show.
3. jusben+u1[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:48:47
>>fishto+(OP)
No. But you'd never have any sort of dependency in a business of that size that wasn't properly licensed/firm. This might help your development teams though prototype stuff more easily without fear knowing that if it got the greenlight then the lawyers/bd people would call Tesla and start negotiating.
4. justin+N1[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:52:26
>>fishto+(OP)
No. But if you were Gigantic Auto Manufacturer, you'd probably have your lawyers talk to Tesla's lawyers and get something in writing first.

This is merely stating that Tesla is open to such things, not a legal guarantee.

[go to top]