zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. tnorth+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:18:59
I suspect that an ambiguously-worded blog post would not be legally binding.
replies(1): >>bitJer+C3
2. bitJer+C3[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:46:15
>>tnorth+(OP)
You don't think a Judge would have serious issues with the founder and CEO suing someone after saying "hey feel free to use our patents to create legitimate products?"
[go to top]