zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. piqufo+(OP)[view] [source] 2013-06-20 13:59:57
Great idea, lets hope it catches on. Unfortunately it seems like parts have been translated into 'trendy' - for example

> Government should only do what only government can do.

uh, what?

replies(2): >>anu_gu+w2 >>snowwr+wq
2. anu_gu+w2[view] [source] 2013-06-20 14:28:17
>>piqufo+(OP)
If you had continued to read the rest of that paragraph, you would have seen this:

> If someone else is doing it — link to it. If we can provide resources (like APIs) that will help other people build things — do that. We should concentrate on the irreducible core.

replies(1): >>piqufo+e7
◧◩
3. piqufo+e7[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-06-20 15:11:34
>>anu_gu+w2
I had continued reading it, and I maintain that single sentences must make (at least logical) sense by themselves. This is marketing jargon trash, and should not be encouraged in a web standards document!
4. snowwr+wq[view] [source] 2013-06-20 18:05:55
>>piqufo+(OP)
What is "trendy" about that? I don't see a single buzzword and the meaning is very clear to me.
replies(1): >>piqufo+yj1
◧◩
5. piqufo+yj1[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-06-21 08:39:16
>>snowwr+wq
OK we disagree, but let's hope the English language survives (though it seems the UK gov. isn't going to champion it).
[go to top]