zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. johns+(OP)[view] [source] 2009-03-09 06:18:32
Flag it if you believe it to be off-topic.
replies(1): >>coding+f
2. coding+f[view] [source] 2009-03-09 06:28:09
>>johns+(OP)
Where's the UI to flag a story as off-topic? I don't see anything on the article page itself, and the FAQ ( http://ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html ) doesn't mention anything about flagging?
replies(3): >>johns+n >>kylec+t >>kajeco+J
◧◩
3. johns+n[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-09 06:31:59
>>coding+f
On the article page, this is what I see: http://screencast.com/t/Wqa1zmMJ I don't know if there is a rep threshold for flagging, but I wouldn't be surprised.
◧◩
4. kylec+t[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-09 06:34:50
>>coding+f
You apparently need at least 51 karma to flag a post. (The number may not be exact, it's not an official source. Also, it says "comments" not "posts", so there may be a different threshold for that)

source: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=439396

replies(1): >>coding+R
◧◩
5. kajeco+J[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-09 06:46:19
>>coding+f
Yeah, I think it's karma. oh well, just get some karma and then talk a little more about it, eh?

I think I've flagged something....once. Yup. Most everything on the front page is interesting, the most interesting of which I upvote, and the few things that aren't I just don't read and let die. the front page changes enough to allow me to do that anyway.

◧◩◪
6. coding+R[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-09 06:53:23
>>kylec+t
Shouldn't these rep limits, and the information about them, be codified into the FAQ?
replies(2): >>allenb+a1 >>lacker+l1
◧◩◪◨
7. allenb+a1[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-09 07:09:42
>>coding+R
karma limits change all the time, due to "inflation." it used to be pretty difficult to get to 100 points. these days you could get there in a day or two, if you're determined.
◧◩◪◨
8. lacker+l1[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-09 07:20:33
>>coding+R
No. Hacker News doesn't have to work the same way as Stack Overflow. Not only are these limits fluctuating and not really public, HN relies on human editors a lot.

That's okay; the models are really different. Stack Overflow needs to scale more because to be useful, there need to be thousands of questions asked every day, and every question needs to be able to get a response. Hacker News can be useful to me even if it only gets a hundred new stories a day, and it's not really a problem if many stories get axed for a bad reason.

[go to top]