zlacker

[parent] [thread] 12 comments
1. rms+(OP)[view] [source] 2009-03-01 11:25:03
Don't forget the one in the source code that will automatically get your account banned! (I leave posting it here as an exercise to the reader.)
replies(3): >>fp+j >>slavin+E >>zepole+H
◧
2. fp+j[view] [source] 2009-03-01 12:15:36
>>rms+(OP)
Priceless! Thank you for making my day.
◧
3. slavin+E[view] [source] 2009-03-01 13:13:41
>>rms+(OP)
I have looked in the source code and haven't seen this? :/
replies(1): >>greml1+I
◧
4. zepole+H[view] [source] 2009-03-01 13:25:36
>>rms+(OP)
http://tinyurl.com/22q5z9
replies(2): >>CalmQu+P >>cool-R+21
◧◩
5. greml1+I[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 13:26:03
>>slavin+E
I believe that he is talking about:

news.arc:1181-1182

replies(2): >>gasull+O1 >>swomba+Q1
◧◩
6. CalmQu+P[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 13:44:52
>>zepole+H
Which ?may? lead to a site "whose name we dare not speak?... which loads only if "http://www." is removed from it... and then displays message:

"Down until 4/19/08 due to bandwidth limitations!

Want to advertise?"

This entire discussion is feeling very surreal - with innuendos about poison-named domains that ban one's account. I do like the idea of openness about banning policies. Why force people to stumble around in the dark and then be punished when they step in the dog piles?

[Or is there a concern about legal concerns if one "vilifies" a site by pronouncing it banned?]

replies(1): >>dhotso+W
◧◩◪
7. dhotso+W[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 13:55:38
>>CalmQu+P
I can't see the site, but it looks like some kind of dumb meme:

http://images.google.com.au/images?q=internet%20serious%20bu...

◧◩
8. cool-R+21[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 14:02:31
>>zepole+H
I don't understand the joke. Can someone please explain?
replies(2): >>gasull+G1 >>rms+v6
◧◩◪
9. gasull+G1[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 15:24:39
>>cool-R+21
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=THE%20INTERNE...

It's an Internet meme.

◧◩◪
10. gasull+O1[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 15:31:23
>>greml1+I
Could you please explain this one?
◧◩◪
11. swomba+Q1[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 15:31:37
>>greml1+I
For the curious, here are the lines:

http://skitch.com/swombat/bgqky/news.arc

I think it just ignores the comment, rather than autobanning.

replies(1): >>static+tc
◧◩◪
12. rms+v6[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-01 21:39:04
>>cool-R+21
That particular site had the Rickroll video and a nasty series of infinite javascript popups. So yes, I was Rickroll'd by Paul Graham, and it crashed my browser.
◧◩◪◨
13. static+tc[view] [source] [discussion] 2009-03-02 04:45:58
>>swomba+Q1
Any reason why you didn't paste that code directly into your comment and took an image of the text instead?

Als, where can I get this code?

[go to top]