zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. refulg+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-08 20:49:16
I'm unconvinced, to my possibly-undercaffeinated mind, the string of 3 posts reads like this:

- a problem already solved in TFA (you vouching for someone eventually denounced doesn't prevent you from being denounced, you can totally do it)

- a per-repo, or worse, global, blockchain to solve incrementing and decrementing integers (vouch vs. denounce)

- a lack of understanding that automated global scoring systems are an abuse vector and something people will avoid. (c.f. Black Mirror and social credit scores in China)

replies(1): >>ashton+BS
2. ashton+BS[view] [source] 2026-02-09 05:02:02
>>refulg+(OP)
Those are good arguments against. I want to make it clear that I think it’s a possibly interesting idea, but also probably a bad one too! :)
[go to top]