zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. ngcazz+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-08 19:38:53
When there's time, you review, when there isn't you trust...
replies(2): >>999900+52 >>adeebs+7d
2. 999900+52[view] [source] 2026-02-08 19:52:01
>>ngcazz+(OP)
That's the issue here.

Even if I trust you, I still need to review your work before merging it.

Good people still make mistakes.

replies(1): >>stavro+7e
3. adeebs+7d[view] [source] 2026-02-08 21:09:45
>>ngcazz+(OP)
What's the rush? Building good things takes time.
replies(1): >>johnny+ko1
◧◩
4. stavro+7e[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 21:16:55
>>999900+52
What is the definition of trust if you still have to verify? How does "trust" differ from "untrust" in that scenario?
replies(1): >>johnny+fo1
◧◩◪
5. johnny+fo1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 08:43:25
>>stavro+7e
trust resudes the verification I suppose. Getting a PR from a trusted contributor would probably have me do a quick scan for obvious mistakes. And they'd know to keep the PR's small and on the right branch to help facilitate a scan.

a new person with a big idea on the slightly wrong (but reasonable) channel would have more work in verification.

◧◩
6. johnny+ko1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 08:43:59
>>adeebs+7d
deadlines, money, attention. The usual things in industry.
[go to top]