zlacker

There is no evidence this is a moral panic.

> But nobody has been able to provide evidence of these things.

Universities are able to provide such evidence, and are the only ones who can.

> that everybody is getting access

There is no evidence that this is actuality, or ever will be.

The "little or no evidence" line to defeat premises is cheap.

>>esbran+(OP)
You have the burden of proof entirely backwards...

>>Tadpol+b6
I think the wrong burdens of proof are being used. "Reasonable suspicion" should be used for investigations.

>>esbran+6b
What is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning?

>>Tadpol+Jc
You've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'.

There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof...

If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence.

... Which is its own kind of proof.