zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. hansvm+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-05 18:32:06
How did that work mechanically though? At YT we were banned from doing basically anything with pre-18yo data, even if we only suspected they might possibly not be an adult -- no A/B tests, no ML, no ad targeting, no nada. Did leadership design a system where those sorts of things would happen anyway? Were there just enough rogue teams to cause problems?
replies(3): >>jacque+U >>iwontb+32 >>worik+bc
2. jacque+U[view] [source] 2026-02-05 18:35:13
>>hansvm+(OP)
Because the product is made to appeal to that particular demographic. The data doesn't really matter if you have that kind of reach.
3. iwontb+32[view] [source] 2026-02-05 18:39:59
>>hansvm+(OP)
For business, government, and religion: achieving scale and centralization necessarily leads to corrupt outcomes. This is also where Marx’s legitimate criticisms of capitalism turn into a solution which is essentially its doppelgänger, a scaled system of corruption with absolute authority with the rhetorical veneer of democracy.
4. worik+bc[view] [source] 2026-02-05 19:20:18
>>hansvm+(OP)
> At YT we were banned from doing basically anything with pre-18yo data

I guess things are different at Google now.

[go to top]