zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. lprove+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-05 10:19:43
So, not a conspicuously wealthy country, then?

Whereas I lived (and am back, sadly) in an offshore tax haven.

The rich used Macs. Musicians used Macs. They were not some dedicated tool only found in certain places. Entire industries, big important industries, ran on them.

What killed Commodore and Atari was that in the end although they had niches, they didn't conquer whole sectors.

This is why Sinclair Research tried to push into the business market with the QL. Sir Clive knew that the home/games sector was about thin margins and price battles, while in rich America, you could get fat on it, you can't in Europe.

He carved out an early niche as the cheapest home computers that were good enough and were competitive, but it was low-margin/high-unit-count.

The business market will pay for good tools. Bits of it paid extra for Macs for decades because they were good at some things.

That is a viable long-term market: "the best cheap home computer for the money" is not.

[go to top]