zlacker

"Child prodigies are more likely to become elite performers" is an equally accurate and less misleading title.

>>energy+(OP)
far more likely

>>energy+(OP)
Equally imprecise.

“Child prodigies are more likely to become elite performers than they are to become non-elite performers”

Vs

“Child prodigies are more likely than non-child prodigies to become elite performers"

Which is it?

>>sherma+b1
Neither. That's what reading the article is for.

>>owenpa+C3
My comment was on the attempted retitling of the article. Agree that neither represent the actual article.