zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ronces+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-05 03:10:51
It doesn't make sense because it's a lie. The author's blog has 2 articles, both of them shilling OpenClaw.
replies(2): >>zarp+o2 >>flexag+07
2. zarp+o2[view] [source] 2026-02-05 03:30:43
>>ronces+(OP)
Spoiler: the author is an OpenClaw instance.
3. flexag+07[view] [source] 2026-02-05 04:16:22
>>ronces+(OP)
Exactly. See also this sentence:

> Look at who’s about to get angry about OpenClaw-style automation: LinkedIn, Facebook, anyone with a walled garden and a careful API strategy.

Browser automation tools have existed for a very long time. Openclaw is not much different in this regard than asking an LLM to generate you a playwright script. Yes, it makes it easier to automate arbitrary tasks, but it's not like it's some sort of breakthrough that completely destroys walled gardens.

[go to top]