zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. indoor+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 18:18:47
I've used Starlink and it's fantastic in rural areas. Why dig thousands of miles of holes for physical wires when the problem is already solved?
replies(1): >>devin+U
2. devin+U[view] [source] 2026-02-04 18:22:18
>>indoor+(OP)
Think. You don't even need to dig. We have myriad wireless internet solutions. We did not need to send satellites into space to fix this problem in a far more cost effective way.
replies(1): >>midtak+N6
◧◩
3. midtak+N6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 18:45:38
>>devin+U
Terrestrial wireless internet solutions are stupid. With a satellite you can be anywhere with line of sight to the southern sky and receive signal. With some shitty tower you're still constrained to your location just as you would be with wired, except that instead of a fast, low latency cable you have a noisy, outage prone wireless tower.
replies(1): >>devin+mb
◧◩◪
4. devin+mb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 19:05:58
>>midtak+N6
This is not a problem that needed to be solved by satellites. It is a failure of US politics that rural areas don't have broadband. We didn't need some private company to put satellites into low earth orbit for someone to watch a youtube video from their house reliably. The ongoing costs and complexities of running a global satellite network vs running a cable is insane.
[go to top]