zlacker

> Whatever sat datacenter they biuld, it will run better/easier/faster/cheaper sitting on the ground in antarctica than it will in space

That is clearly not true. How do you power the data center on antarctica? May i remind you it will be in the shadow of earth for half a year.

>>krisof+(OP)
A tanker full of LNG and a turbine would probably work.

>>krisof+(OP)
Space is so expensive that you can power it pretty much any way you want and it will be cheaper. Nuclear reactor, LNG, batteries (truck them in and out if you have to). Hell, space based solar and beam it down. Why would there ever be an advantage to putting the compute in space?

>>idontw+jk
Get those penguins doing something productive for once, put them on treadmills!

>>adrian+72
Kinda like the ones they are already burning in Starship to put these in space in the first place.

Anywhere on earth is better than space for this application.

>>cmsj+qq
Or burn them in a furnace. Pretty much any way you can think of to accomplish something on earth, is vastly cheaper, easier, and faster than doing it in space.

>>krisof+(OP)
Then you put another in the high north. Two, or six, is still cheaper than one in orbit.

>>krisof+(OP)
> How do you power the data center on antarctica?

Nuclear power plant?

>>krisof+(OP)
By tapping into the geothermals of the volcanoes under the ice. Otherwise nukkular.