zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. direwo+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 10:47:33
If you are thinking about section 230 it only applies to user–generated content, so not server–side AI or timeline algorithms.
replies(1): >>Altern+Fe
2. Altern+Fe[view] [source] 2026-02-04 12:37:30
>>direwo+(OP)
So if a social network tool does the exact same thing, but uses the user's own GPU or NPU to generate the content instead, suddenly it's fine?
replies(2): >>direwo+Di >>numpad+3Z
◧◩
3. direwo+Di[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 13:04:56
>>Altern+Fe
If a user generates child porn on their own and uploads it to a social network, the social network is shielded from liability until they refuse to delete it.
◧◩
4. numpad+3Z[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 16:37:23
>>Altern+Fe
Changes who's technically the perp. Offer managed porn generation service -> service provider is responsible for generating porn, like, literally literally
[go to top]