zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. rxt_ia+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 09:14:48
I'm really curious how they handled certification of a design that was changing apaprently up to the minute it was delivered...
replies(1): >>XRG+La
2. XRG+La[view] [source] 2026-02-04 10:40:08
>>rxt_ia+(OP)
My first guess was that they used an external brick for the power supply with a relatively low output voltage--that would eliminate a lot of the CE test load. However, a cursory glance at the product photos suggests the power supply sits within the base of the lamp. Maybe the product developer can shed some more light on this. ;-)
replies(1): >>rxt_ia+Zi
◧◩
3. rxt_ia+Zi[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 11:42:11
>>XRG+La
That would certainly make certification easier, but as I suspect you understand, wouldnt achieve it alone.

Even if every component was CE qualified, the combination would have to pass its own testing, plus there are a lot more to the standards than just not electrocuting you immediately upon contact.

I can't see any of the energy efficiency labelling that would be required in the UK or EU for example...

replies(1): >>fxtent+3V
◧◩◪
4. fxtent+3V[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 15:28:03
>>rxt_ia+Zi
1. there's no official mention of any CE / FCC certification

2. I asked shortly after the author offered to answer questions, but there was no response

I'm starting to wonder if this project maybe just shipped without CE / FCC certification because they didn't know it would be required.

replies(1): >>rxt_ia+vn1
◧◩◪◨
5. rxt_ia+vn1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 17:33:04
>>fxtent+3V
In the absence of any evidence to the contrary it certainly seems likely.

Pretty concerning for such a high power device.

[go to top]