zlacker

So far, yes, but as far as I can tell their case against the AI giants aren't based on it being for-profit services in any way.

>>vinter+(OP)
The for-profit part may or may not be a qualifier, but the architecture of a centralized service means they automatically become the scene of the crime -- either dissemination or storing of illegal material. Whereas if Stability creates a model, and others use their model locally, the relationship of Stability to the crime is ad-hoc. They aren't an accessory.