zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. codefl+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:14:09
Why the hell would you need a blockchain for automatic payments? Bots that performed financial transactions existed long before “crypto”.
replies(1): >>direwo+lh
2. direwo+lh[view] [source] 2026-02-04 10:29:44
>>codefl+(OP)
The ordinary financial system is constrained by a lot of regulation and it won't let an AI open an account.
replies(2): >>Boppre+ao >>Spooky+Nu
◧◩
3. Boppre+ao[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 11:20:55
>>direwo+lh
Good, KYC exists for a reason. Why does AI need to open an account, anyway? Just give it a debit card with a limit, not a whole new account and contract with a bank.
replies(1): >>direwo+Fs
◧◩◪
4. direwo+Fs[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 11:52:42
>>Boppre+ao
The limit of a debit card is the money in your account.

The bank would argue that an AI using your account on your behalf is fraud.

replies(2): >>Boppre+rt >>Kwpols+9v
◧◩◪◨
5. Boppre+rt[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 11:58:11
>>direwo+Fs
Those are much easier problems to solve, and surely already solved by some fintechs, than bringing cryptocurrencies to the minimum legal compliance and meeting performance requirements.
replies(1): >>direwo+DC
◧◩
6. Spooky+Nu[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 12:08:32
>>direwo+lh
How unreasonable that I can’t make my computer pretend to be a fiduciary.

Those awful regulations won’t let me say the “computer ate my homework”. Imagine.

◧◩◪◨
7. Kwpols+9v[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 12:11:18
>>direwo+Fs
My debit card has specific limits, far less than all my funds. There also exist pre-paid cards, ideal for things like this.
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. direwo+DC[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 13:05:45
>>Boppre+rt
They don't intend to meet the legal compliance requirements. That's the reason for using cryptocurrencies — avoiding compliance.
[go to top]