zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
3 comments
1. indigo+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-02-04 01:02:44
So if one were theoretically infected right now, would a Malwarebytes scan indicate as such?
replies(2):
>>kracke+sP
>>krige+uP
◧
2. kracke+sP
[view]
[source]
2026-02-04 08:33:42
>>indigo+(OP)
OP post has an indicators of compromise list, also seen in
https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-chrysalis-backdoor-dive-...
I'm surprised this wasn't linked from the original notepad++ disclosure
◧
3. krige+uP
[view]
[source]
2026-02-04 08:33:59
>>indigo+(OP)
If you can get Malwarebytes to scan anything. It has been such a victim of enshittification, it's not remotely as useful as it were several years ago.
replies(1):
>>TurboS+B21
◧◩
4. TurboS+B21
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-04 10:15:19
>>krige+uP
In what ways? I'm still using it the same way I was 10 years ago—on-demand scans of individual files—and it seems to work just as well.
[go to top]