zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. shetay+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 22:31:59
I assume the idea is to have the entire constellation be the data center in question. Laser back haul transceiver bandwidth is in the same order of magnitude of rack-to-rack bandwidths [1][2]. I could see each sat being a rack and the entire mesh being a cluster.

[1] https://hackaday.com/2024/02/05/starlinks-inter-satellite-la... (and this is two years ago!) [2] https://resources.nvidia.com/en-us-accelerated-networking-re...

replies(2): >>reacto+Z9 >>kuschk+vh1
2. reacto+Z9[view] [source] 2026-02-03 23:28:25
>>shetay+(OP)
This is how Starlink works however, you would need orders of magnitude more compute than those router pucks. Orders of magnitude more power needs unless you combined a nuclear reactor to it. It’s just such a fever dream at this stage that he’s really doing it to muddy accounting and consolidate debts from Grok failures.
3. kuschk+vh1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:46:24
>>shetay+(OP)
For AI training, latency is one of the limiting factors, which needs to be kept in the nanoseconds. And a light-nanosecond is famously almost exactly 1 foot.

That's why Lumen/Starcloud's designs all assume it'll be a space station with all containers connected to one central networking spine.

[go to top]