zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. izzyda+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 22:04:23
How about we just make a giant heatsink that reaches into space instead. Then we can cool the whole planet. Coming up with crazy ideas is cheap, but the logistics are obviously impractical.
replies(2): >>0x53+81 >>hahaha+TD
2. 0x53+81[view] [source] 2026-02-03 22:10:48
>>izzyda+(OP)
Look into radiative cooling. Basically this, but more practical. Several companies working on it: https://www.skycoolsystems.com/
replies(2): >>grim_i+L8 >>morshu+vp
◧◩
3. grim_i+L8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 22:50:29
>>0x53+81
I don't quite believe this.

Is it really better than just using solar panels to run a heat pump?

replies(1): >>pidge+Tp
◧◩
4. morshu+vp[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 00:25:42
>>0x53+81
This looks like it depends on the outside air to cool the coolant. "Radiative" can mean that too, not just IR radiation.
◧◩◪
5. pidge+Tp[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 00:28:22
>>grim_i+L8
> Our core innovation is a radiative cooling material that we’ve combined with a panel system to improve the efficiency of any vapor-compression based cooling system

A heat pump is a “ vapor-compression based cooling system” so that tech is an addition-to not an instead-of.

Whether it’s better probably depends on how expensive the additional efficiency is in practice.

> SkyCool’s Panels save 2x – 3x as much energy as a solar panel generates given the same area.

So if you’re area constrained maybe.

replies(1): >>grim_i+fx1
6. hahaha+TD[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:00:13
>>izzyda+(OP)
We had one. It was that sulphur used in shipping fuel.
◧◩◪◨
7. grim_i+fx1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 10:08:15
>>pidge+Tp
That's very hard to believe. Radiative cooling is really bad compared to any kind of fan in front of aluminum fins.

Air itself is an isolator, there is a reason you need to shove in fresh air to take on more energy from the heat source.

[go to top]