zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. direwo+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:10:57
Is this not... a propeller? A turboprop engine?
replies(1): >>idontw+u9
2. idontw+u9[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:55:02
>>direwo+(OP)
I’m not an expert but I think the distinction is that the blade tips in these reach supersonic speeds like in turbofans. That is a hard problem to fix because you don’t have the duct to contain the noise and catch the blades if one were to break.
replies(1): >>JumpCr+fF
◧◩
3. JumpCr+fF[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 23:45:12
>>idontw+u9
> the distinction is that the blade tips in these reach supersonic speeds like in turbofans

Commercial engines are not designed to have anything to supersonic.

replies(1): >>idontw+xI
◧◩◪
4. idontw+xI[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 00:03:53
>>JumpCr+fF
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/22316/why-do-tu...
replies(1): >>JumpCr+UO
◧◩◪◨
5. JumpCr+UO[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 00:42:59
>>idontw+xI
Sorry, you’re correct. You want to avoid supersonic tips as much as possible.

Modern turbofans permit supersonic tips during high-thrust regimes. (Part of the work in these new designs is releasing that constraint since those supersonic tips are a bastard.) It’s something sought to be avoided. But not at all costs at all times.

[go to top]