zlacker

[parent] [thread] 23 comments
1. thekev+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:34:26
What about sinking 3 2x4s into the ground and nailing a 4x8 sheet of plywood with a tastefully painted sign indicating the property is not for sale?

It won't stop everyone but any realtor doing due diligence will likely see it. If is lasts long enough, it will show up on Google street view as well.

replies(3): >>teeray+u1 >>dh2022+hx1 >>gwbas1+EZ2
2. teeray+u1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:40:31
>>thekev+(OP)
A motivated attacker need only don a green safety vest and hard hat, then roll up with a white pickup truck, place some orange safety cones and take down the sign with a chainsaw.
replies(2): >>jgolds+Y3 >>thekev+Nf
◧◩
3. jgolds+Y3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:49:17
>>teeray+u1
The point is that nearly all of the people doing this don't even live in the country where the land is being sold from. A simple sign would probably be quite effective
replies(2): >>teeray+P4 >>Cthulh+qR2
◧◩◪
4. teeray+P4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:52:26
>>jgolds+Y3
True, but you can still do a confused deputy attack. The fraudster hires a property manager, informs them that they would like to remove the sign because they wish the list the property for sale. Either that or they con a realtor they're working with into doing it. The unknowing realtor, eager for the commission, knows a guy who can take it down.
replies(4): >>zamada+i9 >>1970-0+Nb >>teachr+Kz >>bjt+bt1
◧◩◪◨
5. zamada+i9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:10:56
>>teeray+P4
There's always something that can happen in any scenario. Social engineering, hiring locals, deeper forms of identity theft, or worse. The possibilities never hit 0, they just become a lot less profitable (and a lot riskier) a scam to try to run.
replies(1): >>SOLAR_+Dm1
◧◩◪◨
6. 1970-0+Nb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:21:21
>>teeray+P4
Who's paying for it? Are they working for free?
replies(2): >>bluGil+oi >>woah+gb1
◧◩
7. thekev+Nf[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:38:44
>>teeray+u1
Note that in the article, the author says how the scammers do everything to avoid having to show up in person. That's because they are in a different country and try to commit the scam without setting foot in the US.
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. bluGil+oi[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:50:13
>>1970-0+Nb
No, but paying someone $300 is cheap when you hope to get a check for several hundred thousand in a few months. (even if the scam is only to get the earnest money that is still a $300 investment for the final thousand or two you make - with very little work)
replies(1): >>margal+kK
◧◩◪◨
9. teachr+Kz[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 21:12:35
>>teeray+P4
For those like me who didn't know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_deputy_problem
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
10. margal+kK[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 22:07:28
>>bluGil+oi
That's a lot of work plus money transfer paper trail for something like this.
replies(1): >>bluGil+1y2
◧◩◪◨⬒
11. woah+gb1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 00:37:40
>>1970-0+Nb
The realtor might pay for it or even do it themselves. It would take 5 minutes with a reciprocating saw. Or the scammer tells the realtor "never mind that" and the realtor tells the buyer.
◧◩◪◨⬒
12. SOLAR_+Dm1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 01:53:09
>>zamada+i9
Yes, locks aren’t there to prevent the determined thief. They are for the 99% of other opportunists that will move on to an easier target immediately when they see your lock is harder to defeat
◧◩◪◨
13. bjt+bt1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 02:44:30
>>teeray+P4
The idea is just to avoid being the softest target. The scammers attempting this fraud don't want to do all the work you describe. They'll just move on to the next vacant property.
14. dh2022+hx1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 03:20:18
>>thekev+(OP)
I think these days the easiest thing is to take a HELOC loan backed by the property. Do not withdraw money from HELOC and pay the $125/year fee. This puts a lien on the property. (The article alluded to this solution by noting these scammers avoid properties with a mortgage).
replies(2): >>charle+AC1 >>NooneA+Sp2
◧◩
15. charle+AC1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 04:12:35
>>dh2022+hx1
I eas thinking of purposefully not paying some kind of invoice to trigger a lien but this way seems more legitimate
◧◩
16. NooneA+Sp2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 11:16:38
>>dh2022+hx1
great

now you made banks interested in supporting these scams

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
17. bluGil+1y2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 12:16:22
>>margal+kK
Presumably the money trail leeds to the Caymon islands or other country where they won't assist investigation.
◧◩◪
18. Cthulh+qR2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 14:22:23
>>jgolds+Y3
I'm sure you could put an ad up on craigslist or fiverr or whatever, one asking for someone to take photos of the property to see if there is a sign, and another to remove it. There's plenty of people willing to do anything for money.
19. gwbas1+EZ2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:02:28
>>thekev+(OP)
It'll work in this area of the country (Connecticut, Massachusetts,) because this is a known scam and relators and attorneys know to keep an eye out for this.

The problem is that a 4x8 plywood sign will weather very fast in New England weather. You're better off following the article's suggestion of flagging the property with the court.

BTW: When these scams happen, you can sue for the irreplaceable value of trees removed, especially if you planned on keeping the lot wooded: https://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/court-of-appeals/...

replies(2): >>Michae+ec3 >>thekev+X37
◧◩
20. Michae+ec3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 15:59:36
>>gwbas1+EZ2
Who can you sue? The scammer?
replies(3): >>gwbas1+eH3 >>gwbas1+e24 >>gwbas1+Hc6
◧◩◪
21. gwbas1+eH3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 18:11:29
>>Michae+ec3
Either the parties involved in the sale who should have known better, such as the relator and/or seller's attorney; or the party that took the trees down.

Furthermore, at least in Massachusetts, when you purchase property you also purchase title insurance that protects you against this. I remember very specifically, at closing, that my attorney explained that the insurance was in case someone came around with an old claim to the land.

It would be interesting to find out who and what paid out, because these scams have been going on for a bit. (There was one linked to where a property owner drove by and found a house being built on their land.)

◧◩◪
22. gwbas1+e24[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 19:45:55
>>Michae+ec3
Might be worth reading this article about the result of a victim suing: https://www.ctinsider.com/connecticut/article/sky-top-terrac...

Regarding the victim, Kenigsberg:

> Kenigsberg received an undisclosed sum. Sky Top Partners gained a clean title to the land, finished the house and made the sale.

> Kenigsberg remains critical of the system that failed to stop the fraud and of public safety agencies that have not found the perpetrators. Under the law it's possible he could have seen the house destroyed and himself enriched more than he was. He prefers to see the case almost as an outside observer, above the fray.

◧◩◪
23. gwbas1+Hc6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 12:39:40
>>Michae+ec3
Here's a plaintiff's lawyer now explaining all the parties they are suing:

https://massrealestatelawblog.com/tag/title-theft-concord-ma...

TLDR: The real property owner contacted the town to block the building permit, and then contacted the other people involved in the sale, the documents provided by the scam artist were obviously foraged, but the sale still went through and construction started.

The other major difference between this one and the other link I posted is that the owner was very likely going to build a home on the property when they retired; unlike the other link that I posted where the property was most likely an investment and going to be sold.

◧◩
24. thekev+X37[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 17:44:17
>>gwbas1+EZ2
"The problem is that a 4x8 plywood sign will weather very fast in New England weather. "

I live in Rochester, NY. Our weather is no better or worse if you are a sheet of plywood outside 24/7. It will last years.

[go to top]