zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jama21+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:26:40
“Powerful enough for productivity tasks” is very variable depending on what you need to be productive in. Office sure. 3D modelling? CAD? Video editing? Ehhhhh not so sure.
replies(1): >>dsr_+G1
2. dsr_+G1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:32:20
>>jama21+(OP)
I hate to tell you this, but people were doing CAD and CNC work on PCs back when a 33MHz 80386 with 8MB of RAM was an expensive computer.

And they did video editing on Amigas with an add-on peripheral called a Video Toaster.

replies(2): >>tomber+F4 >>jama21+Mb7
◧◩
3. tomber+F4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:43:23
>>dsr_+G1
I don’t know enough about CAD to comment but video editing is considerably more expensive now for a bunch of reasons and I don’t think an Amiga could handle it now.

Video compression is a lot more computationally complex now than it was in the 90s, and it is unlikely that an Amiga with a 68k or old PowerPC would be able to handle 4k video with H265 or ProRes. Even if you had specialized hardware to decode it, I’m not 100% sure that an Amiga has enough memory to hold a single decompressed frame to edit against.

Don’t get me wrong, Video Toaster is super awesome, but I don’t think it’s up to modern tasks.

◧◩
4. jama21+Mb7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 18:07:13
>>dsr_+G1
And you’re aware of all the reasons why that hardware wouldn’t handle modern workflows, right? Show me an amiga that will play 4K video let alone render it.
[go to top]