zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. amarch+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:32:15
I think you can replace copyright with whatever the law <insert big company here> wants to break

Last but not least, generating csam and deep fakes porn on social medias and having to see it called free speech

replies(2): >>Spivak+A2 >>xgkick+OM4
2. Spivak+A2[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:41:17
>>amarch+(OP)
All of that last one really says is that broadly speaking the average person has no idea what free speech actually is and the kinds of things that it covers. I put it in the same bucket as like the young kids uploading to YouTube with the comment no copyright infringement intended thinking it's like plagiarism.
replies(1): >>thinkb+x3
◧◩
3. thinkb+x3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 17:44:52
>>Spivak+A2
Can you elaborate on your view about "no copyright infringement intended" being related please?
4. xgkick+OM4[view] [source] 2026-02-04 22:05:06
>>amarch+(OP)
In space, no-one can ... serve you warrants.
[go to top]