zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. rurban+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 16:56:21
@dang The title here is misleading. The original not.

X didn't raid the prosecutors offices, the prosecutors did

replies(3): >>alexrs+rc >>postal+xQ >>latexr+021
2. alexrs+rc[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:48:37
>>rurban+(OP)
I think they meant to put a period after raided.
replies(1): >>labrad+Ie
◧◩
3. labrad+Ie[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 17:56:14
>>alexrs+rc
Fixed. That period was one char too long but I used an "&" instead of "and" to fix it.
4. postal+xQ[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:29:33
>>rurban+(OP)
What X and why did the prosecutors raid their own office?
replies(1): >>chihua+191
5. latexr+021[view] [source] 2026-02-03 21:27:53
>>rurban+(OP)
@mentions aren’t a thing on HN. To contact the moderators, email hn@ycombinator.com (contact is at the bottom of the page).
◧◩
6. chihua+191[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 22:04:30
>>postal+xQ
Some people are calling Twitter "X".

The second part of your question remains a mystery :-)

[go to top]