zlacker

> Toxic = Not a progressive echo chamber

The only intellectual dishonesty is “blaming it on the libs” argument. Ignoring the partisan arguments, the platform was quite literally being used by users to undress women and produce CSAM. [1] Just one of the many examples where you can argue the platform is toxic.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/grok-says-safeguard...

>>darth_+(OP)
The problem is that you/they were calling it toxic long before grok was integrated, and I think you knew that. Hence the accusation of dishonesty, proven in full view for all to see.