zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. koakum+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 15:43:22
Why couldn't they just use SQLite, and not libSQL?
replies(1): >>chungy+Cd1
2. chungy+Cd1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:51:26
>>koakum+(OP)
LibSQL doesn't look anywhere close to active enough to consider it for production IMO.

Just compare the most recent commits from LibSQL: https://github.com/tursodatabase/libsql/commits/main/

To those of SQLite: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline

One of these looks like a healthy and actively maintained project. The other isn't quite dead, but it's limping along.

replies(1): >>jpeele+xj2
◧◩
3. jpeele+xj2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 04:02:47
>>chungy+Cd1
Your activity comparison isn't wrong, but it's because they are focused on doing a complete rewrite instead of focusing on the libSQL fork.

https://turso.tech/blog/we-will-rewrite-sqlite-and-we-are-go...

replies(1): >>koakum+Hk2
◧◩◪
4. koakum+Hk2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 04:12:47
>>jpeele+xj2
So yes, it's abandoned?
[go to top]