zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. esafak+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 15:33:45
As discussed in >>46777409
replies(1): >>empath+p3
2. empath+p3[view] [source] 2026-02-03 15:47:51
>>esafak+(OP)
Wow, that is almost point for point what I had written down in a bunch of documents I had been spreading around at work this week. Excellent post.
[go to top]