zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. mvr123+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 14:31:36
Since it's an old debate that a lot of smart people spent a lot of time thinking about, the best short / simple answer you'll see for it is "you might want to read some more about it". A few keywords here are qualia, perception, descartes and the evil deceiver, berkeley and immaterialism, kant and synthetic a-priori, the nature of the reality of mathematical objects and mathematical truth, etc. If you think it's easy, for sure you have not understood the question yet.
replies(1): >>donkey+Zb
2. donkey+Zb[view] [source] 2026-02-03 15:27:35
>>mvr123+(OP)
I am glad I learned of all this philosophical background. But I am asserting most people who claim "rocks therefore not conscious" haven't thought through this and are doing this based on some unknown supernaturalism.
[go to top]