zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. philip+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 13:41:43
Is it only doxxing if the organisation is digital only? Should we have no right to know who controls a large media organisation?
replies(2): >>mikkup+ia >>vachin+Ga
2. mikkup+ia[view] [source] 2026-02-03 14:37:27
>>philip+(OP)
Whether you have a right to know, according to your personal value system, is orthogonal to whether it's doxing.
replies(1): >>otterl+Ko
3. vachin+Ga[view] [source] 2026-02-03 14:39:24
>>philip+(OP)
This kills the organisation
◧◩
4. otterl+Ko[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 15:42:27
>>mikkup+ia
Rights don’t emanate from one’s subjective personal beliefs. Sure, there are “natural rights” espoused by political philosophers, but in the real world, rights are enshrined in constitutions and codified in laws that we are all subject to.
replies(1): >>mikkup+Hp
◧◩◪
5. mikkup+Hp[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 15:45:39
>>otterl+Ko
Again, irrelevant to the question of whether it's doxing.
replies(1): >>otterl+Gj1
◧◩◪◨
6. otterl+Gj1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:23:57
>>mikkup+Hp
It's absolutely relevant. Some activities break the law; others don't. Why should we care about and assign a negative appellation like "doxxing" to lawful investigative activity?
replies(1): >>mikkup+Hr1
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. mikkup+Hr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:59:50
>>otterl+Gj1
Whether you care about somebody getting doxed is orthogonal to whether they've been doxed. Whether you care or not is entirely up to you, it has no relevance.
[go to top]