zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. xg15+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:22:14
I'm just wondering why this problem shows up now. Why do lots of people suddenly post their old emails with a defective QP decoder?

> For some reason or other, people have been posting a lot of excerpts from old emails on Twitter over the last few days.

On the risk of having missed the latest meme or social media drama, but does anyone know what this "some reason or other" is?

Edit: Question answered.

replies(2): >>ropp+w >>SCdF+y
◧
2. ropp+w[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:24:33
>>xg15+(OP)
the DOJ published another bunch of Epstein emails
◧
3. SCdF+y[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:24:33
>>xg15+(OP)
Presumably the Epstein files, but I'm not on twitter so not sure
replies(3): >>xg15+i1 >>grimgr+Xb >>avemg+Yg
◧◩
4. xg15+i1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 12:28:01
>>SCdF+y
Ooh, that reason. Sorry for having been dense. Thanks!
◧◩
5. grimgr+Xb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 13:40:41
>>SCdF+y
you presume cor=rect

https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02512824?view=person

replies(2): >>xg15+cd >>mxfh+uR2
◧◩◪
6. xg15+cd[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 13:47:21
>>grimgr+Xb
Huh, Noam Chomsky, nice one!
◧◩
7. avemg+Yg[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 14:07:27
>>SCdF+y
Jeff Epstein? The New York financier?
◧◩◪
8. mxfh+uR2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 03:29:10
>>grimgr+Xb
Yet somehow there is always a version of the same thread that's not mangled https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02512795?view=inbox

Can only assume DOJ overpaid the law firms like 5x by not specifying deliveries need to be deduplicated first.

[go to top]