zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jacque+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 10:25:18
Because bugs are bad. Fixing one bug but accidentally introducing three more is such a pattern it should have a name.
replies(2): >>KptMar+w2 >>mining+l5
2. KptMar+w2[view] [source] 2026-02-03 10:50:09
>>jacque+(OP)
They are. And we have processes to minimize them - tests, code review, staging/preprod envs - but they are nowhere close to being 100% sure that code is bug free - that's just way too high bar for both AI and purely human workflows outside of few pretty niche fields.
replies(1): >>jacque+24
◧◩
3. jacque+24[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 11:03:30
>>KptMar+w2
When you use AI to 'fix' something you don't actually understand the chances of this happening go up tremendously.
4. mining+l5[view] [source] 2026-02-03 11:13:23
>>jacque+(OP)
I propose "the whack-a-hydra" pattern
replies(1): >>jacque+16
◧◩
5. jacque+16[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 11:19:30
>>mining+l5
Hehe, yes, very apt. It immediately gives the right mental image.
[go to top]