zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jmyeet+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 06:29:35
I went looking through your comments. 75% of them (and probably 90% in the lasst 2 years) were Elon related. Tesla, SpaceX, Grok, Twitter, DOGE, etc. Quite a lot of comments for 101 karma if I'm being real.

Why do you feel this kneejerk reaction to defend Elon and his companies? You'll never be him. He doesn't care about you. He'd use you for reactor shielding for an uptick in Tesla share price without a second's hesitation. This is cultish behavior.

Do you have any idea who you're defending? I'll give you just one example. A right-wing influencer named Dom Lucre uploaded CSAM to Twitter, a video. But he didn't just upload it. He watermarked it first so had it on his computer and then postporcessed it. It was I believe up for days. This was apparently a video so bad that mere possession should land you in prison. And the fact that the FBI didn't arrest him basically tells you he'd an FBI asset. After taking days to ban him, Elon personally intervened to unban him. Why? Because reasons.

And this is the same man who it's becoming clear was deeply linked with Jeffrey Epstein, as was his brother [1].

Bringing this back to the original point: this is why Twitter lost 80% of its value after Elon acquired it. Advertisers fled because it became a shithole for CSAM and Nazis.

As for "basically no downtime" that's hilarious. I even found you commenting the classic anecdote "it was fine for me" (paraphrased) on one such incident when Twitter DDOSed itself [2].

Your cultish devotion here is pretty obvious eg [3]. I'm genuinely asking: what do you get out of all this?

[1]: https://www.axios.com/local/boulder/2026/02/02/kimbal-musk-j...

[2]: >>36555897

[3]: >>42836560

replies(3): >>Nlight+VH >>Sparyj+QL3 >>Sparyj+hM3
2. Nlight+VH[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:13:29
>>jmyeet+(OP)
Lol, did you spot one of his alts?

But yeah, otherwise agree that his conduct, within a corporate context and otherwise, do not merit the kind of public adulation he's getting.

I also remember (vividly at that) his comments on distributed systems when he bought twitter back in the day and was starting to take it over. I remember thinking to myself, if he's just spewing so much bullshit on this, and I can understand this because it's closer to my body of knowledge, what other such stuff is he pronouncing authoritatively on other domains I don't know so much about?

3. Sparyj+QL3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 05:18:52
>>jmyeet+(OP)
I've never once seen any CSAM or nazi things except the highly publicized Ye postings on Twitter, who also did a super bowl commercial that linked to a nazi tshirt by the way, so go ahead and boycott the NFL too if you like. You simply don't use the service if you think these things. Also, I recall that day that the internet was all a buzz with how twitter is down, obviously only because Elon haters wanted so badly to be right, but I used it all day uninterrupted and wouldn't have even noticed if I didn't read an article about it. You are seriously being brainwashed to hate Elon by mostly democrat mouthpieces who make hit piece articles about how he waved while saying thank you wrong. I defend innoent and wrongly accused people like Elon because so many people clearly making this up out of no where, you literally linked to an article here claiming he has ties to Epstein, like seriously if you ever decide to exit your bubble you'll find out how many people are lying to you.
replies(1): >>queenk+2n8
4. Sparyj+hM3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 05:23:40
>>jmyeet+(OP)
If people stop posting completely wrong things, I'll stop correcting them.
◧◩
5. queenk+2n8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 13:33:30
>>Sparyj+QL3
You may not have seen it, but everyone else did, including the French government, who has summoned musk to court.

So your claim is that the Trump FBI fabricated evidence linking Musk to Epstein? Why do you think they'd do that?

[go to top]