zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. presto+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 04:59:04
While this may be true for casual users, for dev native products like Codex, the desktop experience actually matters a lot. When you are living in the tool for hours, latency, keyboard handling, file system access, and OS-level integration stop being “nice to have” and start affecting real productivity. web or Electron apps are fine for experimentation, but they hit a ceiling fast for serious workflows -- especially if the icp is mostly technical users
replies(2): >>tokioy+f4 >>Xenoam+c9
2. tokioy+f4[view] [source] 2026-02-03 05:43:01
>>presto+(OP)
Still good enough for the majority of the users.
replies(1): >>presto+A5
◧◩
3. presto+A5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 05:55:58
>>tokioy+f4
Fair, I think I'm certainly in the minority. Especially now more then ever with an increasing amount of non-technical people exploring vibe coding, 'good enough' really is good enough for most users
4. Xenoam+c9[view] [source] 2026-02-03 06:28:24
>>presto+(OP)
VSCode is arguably one of the most if not the most popular code editor these days…
replies(1): >>waldre+0a
◧◩
5. waldre+0a[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 06:36:12
>>Xenoam+c9
And they're pretty much the only example of an embedded browser architecture actually performing tolerably and integrating well with the native environment.
replies(1): >>herval+244
◧◩◪
6. herval+244[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 06:44:16
>>waldre+0a
Vscode’s performance is pretty bad. It’s “tolerable” just like any electron app.
[go to top]