zlacker

I am tired of turning features off. At this point I just want a boring browser that handles html/css/js, bookmarks, tabs (should sleep inactive tabs), plugins (for my chosen password manager and ad blocker), and page zoom. Those are the only features I actually use regularly.

That's it, I would be willing to make a one time purchase for that, no subscriptions... Ok, I could maybe be convinced for a subscription if it was a low yearly one.

>>chillf+(OP)
Don't forget an obfuscation layer to spoof things like canvas fingerprinting, installed fonts, etc. I'd pay for that.

>>stackg+q
Sure, I just want the core browser stuff and plugins, security/privacy kinda goes with that.

It feels like browsers are like old IDEs where everything is bundled in. I think it would be much better it they were more like modern code editors where people can make their own custom IDE by installing the plugins they want.

>>chillf+c1
Yup, providing better APIs for external bookmarks management, password management, etc would be much better than trying to provide some “one size fits all full featured built in” implementation.

>>chillf+(OP)
Its not good enough for a fork. It needs to be a major, well maintained product, like firefox.

>>chillf+(OP)
Safari is 90% this, and maybe before they changed how extensions worked it was like 99% this. I weep for how close it was.

>>chillf+(OP)
You should probably look into https://justthebrowser.com/. This software sets up browser corporate policies to achieve exactly what you want.

>>Vortex+Bu
By getting you run run arbitrary code when in the end all is does is install this policy file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/corbindavenport/just-the-b...

Maybe we need a justtheconfig.com