zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. Silver+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-02-02 23:39:06
I disagree. He would be using taxpayer money to boost his preferred speech. And it is essentially campaign funding for the GOP. It should be treated as such.
replies(2):
>>ben_w+R6
>>termin+sc
◧
2. ben_w+R6
[view]
[source]
2026-02-03 00:11:44
>>Silver+(OP)
I think that line of argument would work in my country of birth, the UK, but I don't think it works in the USA.
◧
3. termin+sc
[view]
[source]
2026-02-03 00:48:31
>>Silver+(OP)
You do not lose your right to free speech by providing contractual services to the US government.
[go to top]