zlacker

Agreed...I've been waiting for months now to increase my quota for a specific Azure VM type by 20 cores. I get an email every two weeks saying my request is still backlogged because they don't have the physical hardware available. I haven't seen an issue like this with AWS before...

>>arcdig+(OP)
We've ran into that issue as well, ended up having to move regions entirely because nothing was changing in the current region. I believe it was westus1 at the time. It's a ton of fun to migrate everything over!

That’s was years ago, wild to see they have the same issues.

>>arcdig+(OP)
Is your mental model they are running FCFS or priority allocation?

>>arcdig+(OP)
Can someone explain the point of cloud like I'm a 60 year old grumpy Unix admin because you could just get a real server from another company by now. If the whole point is unlimited capacity but you don't have unlimited capacity and you're paying through the nose then why? Compliance?

>>direwo+vH1
Compliance and tooling are a big part of it, but the places where the big public cloud providers shine is the PaaS offerings that you don't need to write yourself.

In Azure, for example, it's possible to use Entra as your Active Directory, along with the fine grained RBAC built in to the platform. On a host that just gives you VPS/DS, you have to run your own AD (and secondary backups). Likewise with things like webservers (IIS) and SQL Server, which both have PaaS offerings with SLAs and all the infra management tasks handled for you in an easily auditable way.

If you just need a few servers at the IaaS level, the big cloud platforms don't look like a great value. But, if you do a SOC2, for example, you're going to have to build all the documentation and observability/controls yourself.

>>direwo+vH1
At my day job, serverless stuff is great because in a small team with limited budget we don't need extra people to deal with patching, fail-overs etc.