zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. sogane+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:50:49
Are launch costs really 10x!? Could I get a source for that?

In the back on my head this all seemed astronomically far-fetched, but 5.5 million to get 8 GPUs in space... wild. That isn't even a single TB of VRAM.

Are you maybe factoring in the cost to powering them in space in that 5 million?

replies(3): >>torgin+r1 >>smw+j6 >>tinco+uo1
2. torgin+r1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:55:25
>>sogane+(OP)
I guess he adds the weight of all the hardware to make the whole thing work.
3. smw+j6[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:14:42
>>sogane+(OP)
You also need square kms of radiators to cool 100MW
4. tinco+uo1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 09:17:59
>>sogane+(OP)
The Falcon Heavy is $97 million per launch for 64000 kg to LEO, about $1,500 per kg. Starship is gonna be a factor 10 or if you believe Elon a factor 100 cheaper. A single NVidia system is ~140kg. So a single flight can have 350 of them + 14000kg for the system to power it. Right now 97 million to get it into space seems like a weird premium.

Maybe with Starship the premium is less extreme? $10 million per 350 NVidia systems seems already within margins, and $1M would definitely put it in the range of being a rounding error.

But that's only the Elon style "first principles" calculation. When reality hits it's going to be an engineering nightmare on the scale of nuclear power plants. I wouldn't be surprised if they'd spend a billion just figuring out how to get a datacenter operational in space. And you can build a lot of datacenters on earth for a billion.

If you ask me, this is Elon scamming investors for his own personal goals, which is just the principle of having AI be in space. When AI is in space, there's a chance human derived intelligence will survive an extinction event on earth. That's one of the core motivations of Elon.

[go to top]