zlacker

Never mind operational and maintenance costs. In what fantasy world is it cheaper to put a computer in orbit than in a building on the ground? I don't care how reusable and maintenance-free Starship gets, there's no way even absurdly cheap launches are cheaper than a building.

The whole thing makes no sense. What's the advantage of putting AI compute in space? What's even one advantage? There are none. Cooling is harder. Power is harder. Radiation is worse. Maintenance is impossible.

The only reason you'd ever put anything in orbit, aside from rare cases where you need zero-gee, is because you need it to be high up for some reason. Maybe you need it to be above the atmosphere (telescopes), or maybe you need a wide view of the earth (communications satellites), but it's all about the position, and you put up with a lot of downsides for it.

I feel like either I'm taking crazy pills, or all these people talking about AI in space are taking crazy pills. And I don't think it's me.

>>wat100+(OP)
The most generous interpretation is that the "AI in space" nonsense is a cover for putting limited AI in space for StarShield (military version of StarLink), which is essentially the "Golden Dome".

It might be possible to scam the Pentagon with some talk about AI and killer satellites that take down ICBMs.

>>nhq129+f4
> It might be possible to scam the Pentagon with some talk about AI and killer satellites that take down ICBMs.

Honestly that story sounds right up Pete Hegseth's alley.

>>nhq129+f4
Why would they need a cover, though? They can just say “we’re putting AI in space so we can shoot down missiles” and that would be fine.