zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. nutjob+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-02-02 22:25:44
It's a con, his AI business is failing, so he's rolling it up into the profitable business. Did a similar thing with Twitter.
This is so obvious, but it's so stupid and at this scale that people find it hard to believe.
replies(1):
>>Doesnt+d61
◧
2. Doesnt+d61
[view]
[source]
2026-02-03 05:45:43
>>nutjob+(OP)
If they AI business is failing why did they just do a successful large raise?
replies(2):
>>krige+jn1
>>nutjob+aS1
◧◩
3. krige+jn1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-03 08:11:58
>>Doesnt+d61
If the AI business is successful why does it keep changing hands? Where are the profits?
replies(1):
>>Doesnt+nH4
◧◩
4. nutjob+aS1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-03 12:08:17
>>Doesnt+d61
Your implication is that investors are in some way infallible? Hilarious.
replies(1):
>>yandie+lR2
◧◩◪
5. yandie+lR2
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-03 17:09:49
>>nutjob+aS1
WeWork or Theranos. Have we forgotten about them?
◧◩◪
6. Doesnt+nH4
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-04 02:48:30
>>krige+jn1
No ai companies have profits yet.
[go to top]