zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. raggi+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-02 19:09:55
he is counting every c file in the systemd _repository_ which houses multiple projects, libraries and daemons. he equates that to the c file count for a single init. it's a disingenuous comparison. systemd-init is a small slice of the code in the systemd repository.
replies(2): >>cf100c+s2 >>simonc+yz1
2. cf100c+s2[view] [source] 2026-02-02 19:23:48
>>raggi+(OP)
I'm guessing he shares my belief that systemd-init cannot exist in the wild on its own, correct? When you want a teacup, you have to get the whole 12 place dinner set.
replies(1): >>rcxdud+Zj1
◧◩
3. rcxdud+Zj1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 01:19:52
>>cf100c+s2
IIRC the mandatory components are the init system, udev, dbus, and journald. Journald is probably the most otherwise-optional feeling one (udev and dbus are both pretty critical for anything linux regardless), though you can put it into a passthrough mode so you don't have to deal with its log format if you don't want. Everything else is optional.
replies(1): >>simonc+fC1
4. simonc+yz1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 03:11:11
>>raggi+(OP)
> he is counting every c file in the systemd _repository_ which houses multiple projects, libraries and daemons. he equates that to the c file count for a single init. it's a disingenuous comparison.

See, this is why when I refer to the Systemd Project, I spell it as "SystemD", and when I'm referring to systemd(1), I spell it "systemd". I understand that some folks who only wish to shit on the Systemd Project also spell it that way, but I ain't one of them.

> systemd-init is a small slice of the code in the systemd repository.

Given the context:

   Yes, systemd provides a lot of capabilities, but we will be losing some things I consider important.
I'd say that the topic of discussion was SystemD, rather than systemd. systemd doesn't provide you with all that many capabilities; it's really not much more than what you get with OpenRC + a supervisor (either supervise-daemon or s6).
◧◩◪
5. simonc+fC1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 03:33:22
>>rcxdud+Zj1
> ... dbus [is] pretty critical for anything linux regardless

Weird. If I weren't a sicko and had OBS Studio installed on my multipurpose box [0] I'd not have dbus installed on it.

dbus is generally optional; not that many packages require it. [1]

[0] Two of its several purposes are video transcoding and file serving.

[1] This is another area where Gentoo Linux is (sadly) one of the absolute best Linux distros out there.

[go to top]