zlacker

I don't see how this relates to removing SysVinit support from LFS. Choice is good.

>>cf100c+(OP)
That "choice" still has to be maintained. And why spend effort when you can do the same things + more with systemd?

>>preiss+k4
Clearly there are lots of people who don't want something that does what you say systemd does. Bravo that choice is out there, but what a pity that LFS does not seem to have the resources to test future versions for SysVinit.

>>cf100c+(OP)
Are you entitled to the LFS developers time? They build the system they get to make into what they want.

>>cf100c+p9
you can fork it and do it.

But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal